Satyagopal Mandal |
Department of Mathematics |
Office: 624 Snow Hall Phone: 785-864-5180 |
Theorem(Boratynski). Let A be a commutative ring and I be an ideal with
I=(f1, ¼, fk) + I2. |
J=(f1, ¼, fk-1) + I(k-1)!. |
Q ® J |
This theorem of Boratynski had a far reaching impact in the study of complete intersections in affine varieties. Mohan Kumar used this theorem of Boratynski to prove the following theorem.
Theorem(Mohan Kumar). Let A be a reduced affine ring with dim(A)= n over an algebraically closed field k, and let Q be a projective A-module of rank n. Suppose that Q maps onto a complete intersection ideal J = (f1, ¼, fn) of height n. Then Q = Q0 ÅA.
This theorem of Mohan Kumar also had a far reaching consequence. Eventually, using Monhan Kumar's theorem, Murthy (Annals of Mathematics, 1994) proved :
Theorem(Murthy). Let A be a reduced affine ring
with dim(A)= n over an algebraically closed field k, and let
Q be a projective A-module of rank n.
Then Q = Q0 ÅA if and only if
the top Chern Class Cn(Q) = 0 in the Chow Group of zero
cycles.
The theorem of the day that I want present is as follows:
Theorem. Let A be a noetherian commutative ring. Let
r1, ¼,
rk
be nonnegative integers and k £ dim(A).
Let f1, ¼,
fk be a regular
sequence in A. Suppose Q is a projective A-module of rank k.
Suppose we have a surjective map
Q ® (f1r1, ¼, fkrk) |
If (k-1)! divides r1r2¼ rk, then [Q] = [Q0Å A] in K0(A), for some projecive A-module Q0.
In fact, we give a more general theorem on such decomposition of projective modules as follows.
Theorem. Let A be a noetherian commutative ring. Let
r1, ¼,
rk
be positive integers and k £ dim(A).
Let
J0 =(f1, ¼, fk) + J02. |
J1 =(f2, ¼,
fk) + J0r1, J2 =(f1r1, f3, ¼, fk) + J1r2, ¼ ¼ ¼ J = Jk =(f1r1, f2r2, ¼, fk-1rk-1) + Jk-1rk . |
( So, J = Jk =(f1r1, f2r2, ¼, fk-1rk-1 , fkrk) + J2). |
Suppose
that Q is a projective A-module of rank k and there is a surjective
map :
f : Q ® J |
[Q] = [Q0Å A] - (r1r2¼ rk)¤(k-1)!)[A/J0] |
÷ |
| ÷ | = xw-yz |
| = (ax + by +cz) 2 |
So, if (x, y, z) is a unimodular row then
(x 2, y, z) is the first row of
an invertible matrix.
Suslin extended the above:
Theorem. Let A be a commutative ring. Let
r0, r1, ¼,
rn
be nonnegative integers.
Suppose
( | x 0, | x 1, | x 2, | ¼ , | x n | ) |
Assume that n! divides r0r1¼ rn.
Then there is an invertible
matirx a with it's forst row
( | x 0r0, | x 1r1, | x 2r2, | ¼ , | x nrn | ) |
Boratynski used this theorem of Suslin to prove his theorem. Another ingrediant is the Murthy's extension of Boratynski's theorem.
Theorem.
Let A be a commutative ring and I be a locally complete intersection
ideal of height k with
I=(f1, ¼, fk) + I2. |
J=(f1, ¼, fk-1) + I(k-1)!. |
Then J is image of a projective module P of rank k with [P] - k = -[A/I] in K0(A).
The proof of this theorem is done by looking at the "universal ring"
Ak = Z[X1, X2, ¼ ,Xk,Y1,Y2, ¼ ,Yk, Z] ¤( åXi Yi - Z(1+Z)) |
Bk = Z[X1, X2, ¼ ,Xk,Y1,Y2, ¼ ,Yk, S, T, U, V] ¤(SU - TV -1, åXi Yi - ST)) |